Perhaps my understanding of these two treatments are askew. I will start with the SCJ: The hand placement is one hand with fingers adjacent on the body of the sacrum and the middle finger of the other hand on the caudal rabbit hole. This treatment holds the relationship or intention to midline and i wait to there is longitudinal breath that expands fully along the notochord down through the sacrum and into the coccyx, a full expression of midline breath into the caudal pole of the midline. Sometimes when i am holding this relationship i can feel the sacrum and coccyx spinning,moving in opposite directions from one another, pulling off each other and finally realigning and then poof, the sacrum and coccyx energetically flow as a universal unit and breath is deeper and fuller along the midline.
Now here comes my confusion: for the other treatment where the lower coil is not fully exiting or entering with its healthy motion of coiling in and out from the midline from the caudal
rabbit hole the hand placement for this treatment is exactly the same as the SCJ. And now we are down stream from the midline so we are no longer holding the treatment to the midline. My sense is that we are holding the energetic sacrum and coccyx to the point where the lower coil would flow normally from in health. And when i hold this relationship with the lower coil there is a sense of the lower coil finding the room and space to move in and out from the caudal aspect of the midline and confusingly i also get a similar treatment feeling like the SCJ where the sacrum and coccyx is spinning and moving in opposite directions from one another, pulling off each other and finally realigning and then the lower coil finds it space to move in and out from the midline.
What i am confused about is that the two treatments have similar hand placements and when they are treating they have felt similar with the only difference of the lower coil feeling present in the treatment for the lower coil. Steven mentioned about the ganglia impars for the lower coil treatment if i am recalling correctly but i have not had a sense of this while the treatment has been going on.
Now i may be completely wrong in my assessment of these two treatments and i am happily and humbly open to any corrections or additions to what is being reported in this thread.
Thanks yall
bmd